top of page

Lie #18

The Misinformation:


(1)       Historic Resource Assessment Report of The North School Campus Hermosa Beach City School District, by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Daly & Associates slide presentation, presented by Superintendent Pat Escalante at the May 25, 2016 Measure S Informational Presentation.  (TL-2016May10 Historic Resource slide presentation)


NOTE: This presentation and the misinformation contained in it was downloaded to the HBCSD website prior to the $59 Measure S bond vote.


  

(2)       Historic Resource Assessment Report of The North School Campus Hermosa Beach City School District, by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Daly & Associates, 4486 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, dated May 2016. (TL-2016May Historical Resource NS)

 

NOTE: Pam Daly & Associates was hired by Placeworks and HBCSD using taxpayer money.  Even after five significant errors in Pam Daly’s first Historical Resource Assessment Report of North School were reported to HBCSD and Placeworks in March 2017 in a letter submitted for the Environmental Impact Report NOP [Notice of Participation], Pam Daly was not replaced by Placeworks or HBCSD.  Instead, she was allowed to continue reporting misinformation for the draft EIR in her FINAL Historical Resource Assessment Report, Appendix E.


1.      Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates: Page 5:


  …“As such, the buildings and structures located the North

School campus are not under the jurisdiction of the City of Hermosa

Beach Municipal Code or its Historic Resources Preservation

Guidelines.”


NOTE: The misinformation was also contained on slide 3/page 3 in the

slide presentation by Superintendent Pat Escalante at the May 25,

2016 Measure S Informational presentation. (TL-2016May10 Historic

Resource slide presentation)


COMPETING INFORMATION:

Hermosa Beach Preservation Ordinance (Ord. 98-1186, Section 4,

11/10/98) Chapter 17.53 (http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?

page=462)

  17.53.020 Purpose and intent:


“The purpose of this chapter is to promote the public health,

safety, and general welfare by providing for the identification,

protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of historic resources

such as buildings, structures, sites, and places within the City that

reflect the special elements of the City’s architecture, artistic,

cultural, historical, political, and social heritage…”


17.53.030 Area of application:


This chapter shall apply to all historic resources, publicly and

privately owned, within the corporate limits of the City of Hermosa

Beach.”


2. Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates:  Page 15:


…”the construction company of Johnson and Hansen was

awarded a contract to reconstruct the sole building of North School

for $9,066 [in 1934].  According to architectural drawings on file

with the Hermosa Beach City School District, the rebuilding of North

School was designed by the architectural firm of Marsh, Smith & Powell

(MSP).”


CORRECT INFORMATION:  Green Bill document [the earliest version of

DSA documents] for Application 382 AND the architectural drawings on

file at the Division of State Architects CLEARLY shows that the

construction company of Johnson and Hansen along with architect

Samuel E. Lunden, NOT MSP as Pam Daly states above, was the team

that reconstructed North School after the 1933 Long Beach earthquake.


NOTE: How did Pam Daly miss the fact that renowned architect

Samuel E. Lunden reconstructed the main building at North School?

Was she told NOT to identify Samuel Lunden as the true architect

by someone at HBCSD so the school district could justify to Hermosa

Beach residents the demolition of the North School campus?


3. Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates: Page 20: Re:1930s

Main Kindergarten and Classroom Buildings.


“When the North School building was badly damaged from the

Long Beach earthquake in 1933, the firm of MSP [Marsh, Smith and

Powell] was retained by the District to rehabilitate the existing

North School Building.


CORRECT INFORMATION: All documents for North School Application

#382 AND the architectural drawings on file at the Division of State

Architects CLEARLY show that architect Samuel E. Lunden, NOT MSP as

Pam Daly states above, was the architect that reconstructed North

School after the 1933 Long Beach earthquake.  (TL-1934 Green Bill

for NS) Pam Daly repeats her earlier misinformation.

NOTE: There is no excuse for Pam Daly to get this information

wrong, other than for her purposely lying on this taxpayer paid

report.

4. Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates: Page 21: 1. North School

Main Building.


… “During the Long Beach earthquake of 1933, the building was

substantially damaged and the District was required to have the

building repaired and reconstructed.  The architectural firm of MSP

[Marsh, Smith & Powell] (David D. Smith, architect) was responsible for

the design and reconstruction of the building.” 


(Attributed to the Hermosa Beach City School District. “Board of

Trustee, Volume 2 (1928-1934)”, page 44.)

  CORRECT INFORMATION: Samuel Lunden was the architect for the

reconstruction of North School in 1934.  The reconstruction of North

School was DSA project #382.


5.      Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates: Slide presentation, slide

#9, Historic Context.


Pam Daly omits Samuel Lunden’s name from the Rebuilding of North

School. However, she lists the names of the other architects in the

Historic Context.  Was this an oversight or intentional omission?

 6. Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates:  Page 22: 1. North School

Main Building.


“The Pier Avenue School had also been severely damaged from

the earthquake, and one of it original architects, Samuel Lunden, was

given the job of rebuilding that school building.”


COMPETING INFORMATION:  Samuel Lunden was born in 1897. According

to Pam Daly’s report Pier Avenue School was built in 1911 by Richard

D. King in the Neoclassical style of architecture, similar in design

to the original Pier Avenue School building.


NOTE: Samuel Lunden was 14 years old in 1911 when Pier Avenue School

was built. Therefore, Samuel Lunden was NOT one of Pier Avenue

School’s original architects. Why is Pam Daly just making up

"information” in her Historic Resource Assessment of North School?


7.   Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates:


Slide presentation: Slide #10, Post Long Beach Earthquake

Reconstruction of North School.


Pam Daly incorrectly names architect Norman Foote Marsh of Marsh,

Smith, Powell architects as the architectural team that reconstruction

of North School.  Further down on the slide Pam Daly ALSO names David

D. Smith as the architect for the reconstruction of North School after

the Long Beach earthquake.


CORRECT INFORMATION: Neither Norman Foote March nor David D.

Smith were the architects for the reconstruction of North School.

According to the blueprints for the reconstruction of North School

and DSA application 382, the principal architect for the

reconstruction of North School was renowned architect Samuel

Lunden. However, MSP were also a renowned architectural team

specializing in cutting-edge design for public schools in the 1930s

– 1950s. MSP were the principal architects on two other buildings

at North School that were built in the Le Corbusier architectural

style in 1939.


8.   Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates:


Slide presentation: Slide #10, Post Long Beach Earthquake

Reconstruction of North School.


Pam Daly also states that:


“[MSP was] responsible for the design and reconstruction of the

North School building after the Long Beach earthquake”.


COMPETING INFORMATION:  Pam Daly incorrectly attributes the design

and reconstruction of the original North School building after the

Long Beach earthquake to MSP and architect David D. Smith.  Samuel

Lunden was the architect who was responsible for the "design" and

reconstruction of the North School main classroom building.  The

significance of this statement by Pam Daly is that even though she

identified the wrong architect for the reconstruction of North School

in 1934, she however admits that there was “design” involved in the

reconstruction of North School.


NOTE: This statement contradicts HBCSD Attorney Terry Tao's

statements at the May 31, 2016 presentation to the Joint meeting

of the HB City Council members and HBCSD School Board members.

Time Stamp: 02:28:10.


HBCSD attorney Terry Tao states:


“So if you, if you go to the DSA and you get the application, um,

from 1934, that what it looks like, and you’ll see up here that, it is also

for reconstruction.  So, remember that number? 382?  That’s the

number right there for the DSA application, 382.  So, it was just a

six-page renovation of an earthquake damaged building.  It is not a

Lunden design.”


9.   Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates: Page 22: “1. North

School Main Building.” 


“Lunden had chosen to rehabilitate the Pier Avenue School in a

Modern style.  MSP [architects] may have been asked by the District to

use the Moderne style of architecture for rebuilding of North School, so

that it reflected the style of architecture used on Hermosa Beach’s

most prominent school building.”


CORRECT INFORMATION: Pier Avenue school (1935 DSA applications

numbers #692 & #882) was reconstructed AFTER the reconstruction of

North School (1934 DSA application number #382), not before.

Therefore, the Art Deco/Moderne style of architecture was used in

the design of North School before it was used for the design of Pier

Avenue School. Again, Pam Daly seems to be just making up

“information” in her Historic Resource Assessment of North School.

Why?  Did someone tell her to lie? Is that how she got her job

with HBCSD – because she was willing to lie for the school district

and downplay the facts of North School for money?


CORRECT INFORMATION:  All documents for North School Application

382 AND the architectural drawings on file at the Division of State

Architects CLEARLY show that architect Samuel E. Lunden, NOT MSP as

Pam Daly states above, was the architect that reconstructed North

School after the 1933 Long Beach earthquake.  Pam Daly repeats her

earlier misinformation.

 

(3)       Final Historic Resource Assessment Report of The North School Campus Hermosa Beach City School District, by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Daly & Associates, 4486 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, dated July 2017.  (TL-2017Jul Final Historic Resource NS) used as an Exhibit for the 2019 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was accepted by school board members in February 2019.

 

"As a professional paid with taxpayer money to write an important Historic Resource Assessment for an important and highly impactful draft-EIR, Ms. Daly’s fabrications, omissions and errors ae inexcusable.”  (TL-2018Jan2 P Daly errors in EIR)


NOTE Despite proof of misinformation sent to HBCSD administration (TL-2017Jul Pam Daly Fabrications) about the rampant and inexcusable misinformation contained in Pam Daly’s Historic Resource Assessment Report of North School the district seemed to double-down on, and simply ignore the misinformation.  There seemed to be no concern or attempt by HBCSD to correct or prevent misinformation contained in their reports and meetings. 

 

NOTE:  Pam Daly’s Historic Resource Assessment Report of North School was posted on the worldwide web for years by HBCSD despite the numerous mistakes in the report that were pointed out to HBCSD administration.  

 

NOTE: At the May 31, 2016 Joint City and School District meeting, HBCSD attorney Terry Tao states that:  “We are working on the one over in Torrance right now, in case you’re interested.  That one is also being done by Pam Daly, um, the same person whose evaluation you’re looking at, um, but that’s not the reason I’m here.”  May 31, 2016 presentation to the Joint meeting of the HB City Council members and HBCSD School Board members.  Time Stamp: 02:00:55   Did Pam Daly make as many “mistakes” in her Historic Assessment for Torrance as she did for Hermosa Beach?  

 

NOTE: Was Pam Daly one of HBCSD attorney Terry Tao’s “go-to helpers” to provide misinformation to taxpayers?  Is that why she was hired by HBCSD?  (TL-2016May-July Terry Tao billing)


1.   Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates: Environmental Impact

Report page E-26 and E27:


[Samuel] Lunden and [Paul] Jeffers did require that the four

chimneys of the classrooms fireplaces/stoves be removed, and that

the main entrance to the building, a character-defining feature of

school architecture, be walled off to provide greater structural

stability to the front elevation.  Except for the sealing-off of

the front vestibule…”  …”this resulted in the cross-gable roof, in

the center of the south roof plane, becoming a “ghost” architectural

feature for the center entrance that no longer exists.”


Final Historic Resource Assessment Report of The North School Campus

Hermosa Beach City School District, by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Daly

& Associates, 4486 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, dated

July 2017.  (TL-2017Jul Final Historic Resource NS) The Final

Historic Resource Assessment Report was used as an Exhibit for the

2019 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was accepted by school

board members in February 2019.

 

CORRECT INFORMATION: Samuel Lunden’s architectural blueprints for

the reconstruction of North School after the 1933 Long Beach

earthquake, sheet 2 of 6, clearly shows that Lunden DID NOT wall-off

the entrance to the building as Pam Daly claims.  (TL-1934 A-382 NS

p1&2 detail)


To support her intentional misinformation, Ms. Daly does not include

Sheet 2 out of a total of six sheets of blueprints in the appendix of

her report. Sheet 2 clearly shows the front entrance of the

reconstructed North School building that Samuel Lunden redesigned

after the 1933 LB earthquake.


NOTE: Why would Pam Daly intentionally lie to the people of Hermosa

Beach?  Did she do it for money? Who at HBCSD told her to lie?  Did

Pam Daly lie because the cabal wanted her to lie so they could justify

tearing down North School?  It is believed that part of the quid pro

quo for HBCSD denying their contractual provisions to temporarily use

the Community Center for students was a brand-new campus at North

School, whether the district needed it or not.

 

Pam Daly’s “mistakes” are obvious intentional deception of Hermosa Beach taxpayers and the Coastal Commission

 condoned by HBCSD Superintendent Pat Escalante, HBCSD School Board members and Placeworks

(TL-2015 Sep 23 Placeworks contract).


2. Pam Daly, M.S.H.P. of Daly & Associates:  Environmental Impact

Report page E-30 and E31:


“The same style of window sash is found along the rear

(north) elevation, in groupings of four, three-sash tall units,

with two, two-sash tall units in one combined unit at the east

end of the building;…  and a six-wide, three-sash tall unit at

the west end of the façade.”

CORRECT INFORMATION: In her description of the north elevation of

the main building, Daly is using the photo on page E-31 for reference.

She seems to have no first-hand knowledge of the actual building she

is describing in her report.


In the photo on page E-31, the bottom portion of the east end of the

building is covered by a large piece of plywood – left in front of the

windows by someone.  Ms. Daly incorrectly and inexcusably describes

the windows that are behind the large piece of plywood as being a

group of “four, three-sash tall units with two, two-sash tall units in

one combined unit”, when in actuality the windows at both the east

and west ends mirror each other and are both six-wide, three-sashed

tall units.


(4) Terry Tao, HBCSD Attorney (2002 -):  


“So, North School was completed on September 10, 1924, the

earthquake occurred March 10, 1933.  And then there was a remodel

of North completed in December of 1934.”


May 31, 2016 presentation to the Joint meeting of the HB City Council

and HBCSD School Board.  Time Stamp: 02:28:10  

 

MISLEADING STATEMENT: Department State of Architecture (DSA) documents for Application #382 specify that North School was reconstructed, NOT remodeled. 


 

(5) Terry Tao, HBCSD Attorney (2002 -): Slide: North School Blueprint Sheet #2 from Samuel Lunden.


"The reason I included this slide, is because I happened to

look at the drawings.  I’m a licensed California architect, so this

is kind of what I do.  So, um, here are the drawings.  It’s actually

only six pages”


May 31, 2016 presentation to the Joint meeting of the HB City Council

and HBCSD School Board.  Time Stamp: 02:28:10 

 

DECEPTIVE STATEMENT: The kindergarten building designed by the famous architectural team of Marsh, Smith and Powell (MSP) which is located next to the Main North School building had five pages of blueprints, yet Terry Tao is not denying that that wasn’t an actual MSP Architect’s designed building.

 


6.   Terry Tao, HBCSD Attorney (2002 -):


“So if you, if you go to the DSA and you get the application,

um, from 1934, that what it looks like, and you’ll see up here that,

it is also for reconstruction.  So, remember that number?  382?  That’s

the number right there for the DSA application, 382.  So, it was just

a six-page renovation of an earthquake damaged building.  It is not a

Lunden design.”


May 31, 2016 presentation to the Joint meeting of the HB City Council members and HBCSD School Board members.  Time Stamp: 02:28:10

 

FALSIFICATION:  Terry Tao states that North School was "just a six-page renovation".


1. North School was a RECONSTRUCION NOT a renovation.


2. The 1939 classroom building done at North School by Marsh,

Smith and Powell (MSP) also contained only five pages, but

Terry Tao does not dispute that those buildings were original

designs by MSP.


3. Samuel Lunden included 61 pages of hand-typed instructions

and six pages of architectural drawings in his application to

the DSA for the reconstruction of North School in 1934. (TL-1934

Lunden's 61 pages of specs for NS), (TL-1934 Six pages blueprints

for NS)


4. The before and after photos of the original classroom building

designed by Richard D. King in the Neoclassical Revival style

and the reconstruction done by Samuel Lunden in the WPA

Moderne style are completely different.


CORRECT INFORMATION: State of California Division of Architecture, Application No. 382, Filed 6/21/34: Application for Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Construction, Reconstruction, Alterations of or Additions to a School Building.  “Herby make application for the approval of the plans and specification for the Reconstruction of North School. Architect Samuel E. Lunden, Structural Engineer Paul E. Jeffers.  Specification sheets: 61 sheets." 

 

COMPETING INFORMATION:  At the 02:45:55 mark, Terry Tao has no problem admitting that Samuel Lunden is a “very significant architect” when it comes to the reconstruction of Pier Avenue School which Samuel Lunden reconstructed at about the same time as North School.:


[Terry Tao]  “Oh, you know what?  I, um, I had thought about that a

little bit when I was wandering around the school the other day, or

the Community Center, the other day.  Um, this is a very significant

architect [Samuel Lunden] that actually worked on this school, so more

likely than not it would be considered a cultural resource.”


NOTE: North School should have also been considered a cultural resource as is Pier Avenue School.  Both North School and Pier Avenue School are excellent examples of WPA Moderne architecture by renowned architect Samuel Lunden.  (TL-Samuel Lunden Doheny Library)

 

NOTE: Samuel Lunden was also a person of significance to South Bay history and culture.  Example: Samuel Lunden was instrumental in getting the Pacific Coast Highway routed close to Redondo, Hermosa and Manhattan Beach in the 1930s, he designed the Doheny Library at USC (1933) and the Southern California Stock Exchange building in 1929.  (TL-Samuel Lunden architect)

 

NOTE: A significant associate and colleague of Samuel Lunden was Roger Hayward. Roger Hayward may have have been retained by Lunden to create the decorative inset at North School above the front entrance.


A.      Roger Hayward was a renowned sculptor, artist, inventor and

architect.  In 1934 he sculpted a 38-foot model of the moon

for the Griffith Park Planetarium (TL-Roger Hayward artist &

inventor) (http://astronomy.snjr.net/blog/?p=698).  He

collaborated with Linus Pauling, recipient of the Nobel Prize

in chemistry, on several books including the Architecture of

Molecules and drew 57 pastel panels of molecules for the book.


B.      Roger Hayward designed much of the exterior of the USC Doheny

Library.  (TL-Roger Hayward Western Years)


C. It is very likely that the inset decorative panel above the

original entrance at North School of the lamp of learning

signifying the burning desire to learn, sitting a top three

books with the Greek symbols of Alpha and Omega signifying the

sum of all knowledge was a contribution by Samuel Lunden’s

friend and business partner, Roger Hayward. 


D. The decorative inset at North School has a similar motif as

on the arch entrance to the Doheny Library at USC, which Lunden

with assistance from Hayward had finished the year prior to

building North School.



The information in this website proves these statement as fact.

bottom of page